The AI company's decision might be a justifiable idea, but the company appears to have done it for the wrong reason.

State and federal courts have almost uniformly ruled that searches of ALPR databases do not implicate the Fourth Amendment.

What is this even supposed to mean? Is it just self-parody?

In a 2019 analysis of American politics, Johns Hopkins University's Daniel Schlozman and Colgate University's Sam Rosenfeld ...

During his family trip to England last year, Vice President J.D. Vance lectured the European Union on its approach to free ...

From today's First Circuit decision today in Bean Maine Lobster, Inc. v. Monterey Bay Aquarium Found., written by Judge ...

Tax revenue increased by about 3 percent last year, but spending increased twice as fast. And interest payments on the debt ...

The U.S. Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has withdrawn its proposal for a rule that would require financial institutions to report on cryptocurrency transactions that they ...

From the Sept. 30 decision in People v. Barraza by California Court of Appeal Justice Richard Huffman, joined by ...

Plus: Tariffs and Michigan, LGBT teens, Stewart Brand fanfare, and more ...

The program, which NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya announced in a Science editorial and a press briefing in September, is the ...